International Free Mark Lankford Campaign
Random Observations, volume 12 (52nd Birthday Edition), 5th June 2008
Greetings to everyone and I hope
all is far better for you than what I'm experiencing this 25
April, 2008. I wish to thank everyone for the letters, e-mails,
cards, prayers and positive energy extended toward me during
these dark days.
As you all know, I was illegally convicted, in violation of Idaho
law, the Idaho constitution and the US constitution. I was
scheduled to be sentenced to "slow death" on 17 April,
but this has been moved to 19 June, 2008. The "motion for a
new trial" has not prompted a hearing, nor have I had any
contact whatsoever from my "attorneys" since 12 March (only
once here since 19 February).
I was able to have three very good visits with Sally Montana from
Zurich. She had researched the case via newspapers and had some
apt, pertinent questions. These I will attempt to address in this
communiqué. Remember, that which is reported in Idaho media is
neither objective nor accurate. They only publish what they
perceive to be in conformance with the prejudices of their
anticipated readership.
Point one: I did not lose my job at Tenneco Oil in 1983. I "left"
(quit) my job. I also "left" my severance pay, my last
paycheck, my stock and my credit union money. Of interest: not
one document from my company has ever been utilized in court.
Also, no document from my bank has ever been used in court, only
my personal checkbook. You do the math!
Point two: My 1982 Z-28 Camaro was in complete working order. The
deputy sheriff stated it was "operable". The (reputed)
late Robert James Lankford was a pathological liar, seemingly
afraid of his own shadow. He committed perjury with impunity and
my attorneys were ineffective in "pinning the tail on the
donkey", refusing to investigate. Kovis called Robert,
Bryan, Lee John and Layne Thomas "liars and deceivers",
which is very true. Bryan and Layne Thomas admitted to being
liars at least. Of course, the prosecution had made "deals"
with them both, immunizing them from prosecution for perjury. How
nice!
Point three: "Timeline" issue. The lying Dennis Albers,
who has been admonished by the Idaho State Bar for jury
tampering, lied to my jury in closing arguments numerous times.
This is prosecutorial misconduct (only a small part of the
rampant misconduct displayed at my "trial"). Albers'
"theory" was/is that it was/is not possible for me to
be standing on the highway at approximately 9:15-9:30 pm on the
evening of 21 June, 1983. He "theorizes" that Bryan and
I were up the mountain by that time, with Mr. and Mrs. Bravence
either in the Volkswagen van or where they were found. His "theory"
is that Mr. and Mrs. Bravence were either knocked out or killed (he
doesn't know which) at 8:30 pm at Sheepcreek Campground.
Blowing the Albers theory out of the water is the testimony of
the prosecution's own witness, the last person to see either of
the Bravences alive before Bryan murdered them! This man, Jerry
Lonnevik, stated he wanted to spend the night at the Sheepcreek
Campground. When he stopped on the highway, he saw "right
before dark at about 9:00 pm, a green and white Volkswagen van at
the campsight"! He stated he saw "one person standing
at the campsight with a nice camp set up".
Who was this "one person"? Was it Mr. Bravence or was
it Bryan? How could the van be there at 9:00 pm if Albers says we
were up on the mountain with the van then? Lonnevik says he saw
no one walking on the road. Then where was Bryan? Where was I?
How does Albers justify his extremely important discrepancy/evidence
problem? He simply says Mr. Lonnevik was mistaken! (Lonnevik
testified the same way at both trials.) As Albers also told the
jury, "We don't have to prove Mark Lankford killed anyone.
We 'think' he did. We just have to prove he was somehow involved
in the robbery" somewhere along the line. Preposterous, yet
the jury still convicted me!
Further, on the "timeline", Albers says it could not
have happened the way I testified: that it had to have been at 8:30
pm. He says that is the only way to get from Sheepcreek, up the
mountain, place the Bravences on Summit Flat, drive back down to
Grangeville and on to a motel in Pendleton, Oregon to be there
before dayalight. This is nonsense and easy to debunk.
One: The motel clerk, a drifting sort of fellow named Andy W.
Dale, says he was on duty between 2:00 am and 6:00 am on 22 June,
1983. He didn't know the time of the person checking in, but
believed it "dark". Albers says it was daylight or
"sunrise at 4:00 am", which I say is foolishness. It's
purely a manufactured time! The motel receipt, signed by Bryan (remember
that Bryan assumed the identity of Mr. Bravence and signed all
credit cards/travelers' checks "Robert M. Bravence")
did not have a time listed.
Two: Sheepcreek to Summit Flat is listed at, driving slowly,
about 40 minutes. (Bryan did not drive this slowly.) So, say, up
and back is about one hour, 15 minutes. Grangeville to Pendleton
is about 225 miles, which can be driven at about 55 miles per
hour in about four hours, 15 minutes.
(Bryan did not drive 55 and stopped for gas only once.) Ergo,
about five hours, 30 minutes in this timeline scenario on their (prosecutor's)
alleged speed. If you were at Sheepcreek at even 10:00 pm, you
could make the entire trip in less than six hours! Albers lied to
the jury, which is illegal and unethical!
So, Bryan killed the Bravences at about 9:15 pm, found me on
Highway 14 at about 9:30 pm. We went up to Summit Flat at about
10:20 pm, back down the mountain and to Grangeville at about 11:45
pm. Drove from Grangeville to Pendleton at Bryan's speed and
arrived before 4:00 am.! All these times are amorphous, as no one
knows the "exact" times, not one solitary soul! Is this
not cause for "Reasonable Doubt"? It's so simple when
you tell the truth! But my trial was, as Kovis told the jury,
tainted and infected with the prosecution's "lies, deception
and speculation"! Is this any way to seek justice, fairness
and truth?!
These lies and deceit do not honor Mr. and Mrs. Bravence, nor do
they bring them back. The state is now working to have Bryan
freed for his inhuman crimes, which sickens the collective
conscience of us all.
Thank you for your help and paying attention to the truth. I do
need much help, especially a bunch of zealous attorneys and
journalists to take an investigative interest. I bid you peace
and go with God!
Mark Lankford
Publisher and
website holder / News folder